4.7 Article

Pharmacokinetics of prenylated hop phenols in women following oral administration of a standardized extract of hops

Journal

MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH
Volume 58, Issue 10, Pages 1962-1969

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201400245

Keywords

Hops; Isoxanthohumol; Pharmacokinetics; 8-Prenylnaringenin; Xanthohumol

Funding

  1. NIH, Office of Dietary Supplements [P50 AT00155]
  2. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Scope: Women seeking alternatives to hormone-replacement therapy for menopausal symptoms often try botanical dietary supplements containing extracts of hops (Humulus lupulus L.). Hops contain 8-prenylnaringenin (8-PN), a potent phytoestrogen, the related flavanones 6-prenylnaringenin and isoxanthohumol (IX), and the prenylated chalcone xanthohumol (XN). Methods and results: After chemically and biologically standardizing an extract of spent hops to these marker compounds, an escalating dose study was carried out in menopausal women to evaluate safety and pharmacokinetics. 8-PN, 6-prenylnaringenin, IX, and XN, sex hormones, and prothrombin time were determined in blood samples and/or 24 h urine samples. There was no effect on sex hormones or blood clotting. The maximum serum concentrations of the prenylated phenols were dose-dependent and were reached from 2 to 7 h, indicating slow absorption. The marker compounds formed glucuronides that were found in serum and urine. Secondary peaks at 5 h in the serum concentration-time curves indicated enterohepatic recirculation. The serum concentration-time curves indicated demethylation of IX to form 8-PN and cyclization of XN to IX. Slow absorption and enterohepatic recirculation contributed to half-lives exceeding 20 h. Conclusion: This human study indicated long half-lives of the estrogenic and proestrogenic prenylated phenols in hops but no acute toxicity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available