4.7 Article

UPLC-QTOF/MS metabolic profiling unveils urinary changes in humans after a whole grain rye versus refined wheat bread intervention

Journal

MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages 412-422

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201200571

Keywords

Alkylresorcinols; Metabolomics; Rye bread; UPLC-QTOF; MS; Whole grain

Funding

  1. Nordic Centre of Excellence on 'Systems biology in controlled dietary interventions and cohort studies' (SYSDIET) [070014]
  2. Nordic health - whole grain food/HELGA
  3. OPUS
  4. Nordea Foundation
  5. Academy of Finland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Scope Non-targeted urine metabolite profiling has not been previously exploited in the field of whole grain (WG) products. WG products, particularly rye, are important elements in a healthy Nordic diet. The aim of this study was to identify novel urinary biomarkers of WG rye bread (RB) intake in a randomised crossover study with RB versus refined wheat bread (WB). Methods and results UPLC-QTOF/MS metabolite profiling was applied to urine from a 2 x 4 wk crossover intervention with RB versus WB in 20 subjects. Sixteen metabolites were revealed as major contributing biomarkers. The most discriminative metabolite after the cereal intervention was identified as 3-(3,5-dihydroxyphenyl)-1-propanoic acid sulphate, which was excreted to a higher extent after the RB versus WB intervention. Other alkylresorcinol metabolites were identified, as well as enterolactone glucuronide, azelaic acid, 2-aminophenol sulphate and its benzoxazinoid precursor 2,4-dihydroxy-1,4-benzoxazin-3-one. Our study also suggests that nitrogen-containing metabolites are other major markers. However, other methodologies will be needed to elucidate their final structure. Conclusion The present non-targeted metabolite profiling proved to be a useful approach to identify major urine metabolites discriminating RB intake from that of white wheat bread. Once validated these markers could help evaluate compliance to healthy Nordic diets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available