4.7 Article

PPARα L162V polymorphism alters the potential of n-3 fatty acids to increase lipoprotein lipase activity

Journal

MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH
Volume 54, Issue 4, Pages 543-550

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.200900085

Keywords

Docosahexaenoic acid; Eicosapentanoic acid; Lipoprotein lipase; PPAR alpha polymorphism; Triglycerides

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [MOP-200609]
  2. CIHR Bisby Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Omega-3 fatty acids (FAs) may accelerate plasma triglyceride (TG) clearance by altering lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity. Yet, the ability of n-3 FAs to increase LPL activity is dependent on transcription factors such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPAR alpha). The objective was to examine the effects of n-3 FAs on LPL activity considering the occurrence of PPAR alpha L162V polymorphism. First, 14 pairs of men either L162 homozygotes or carriers of the V162 allele were supplemented with n-3 FAs. Second, transient transfections in HepG2 cells, for the L162- and V162-PPAR alpha variants with the peroxisome proliferator-response element from the human LPL gene, were transactivated with n-3 FAs. In vivo results demonstrate that the LPL activity increased non-significantly by 14.4% in L162 homozygotes compared with 6.6% in carriers of the PPAR alpha-V162 allele, after n-3 FA supplementation. Additionally, the L162 homozygotes tended towards an inverse correlation between LPL activities and plasma TG levels. Conversely, carriers of the V162 allele showed no such relationship. In vitro data demonstrates that transcription rates of LPL tended to be higher for the L162-PPAR alpha. than V162-PPAR alpha after n-3 FAs activation. Overall, these results indicate that n-3 FA supplementation increases the transcription rate of LPL to a greater extent in L162-PPAR alpha than V162-PPAR alpha.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available