4.8 Article

Quality and quantity of TFH cells are critical for broad antibody development in SHIVAD8 infection

Journal

SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Volume 7, Issue 298, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aab3964

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute, NIH [HHSN261200800001E]
  2. Intramural Research Program of the Vaccine Research Center
  3. Intramural Research Program of the NIAID, NIH
  4. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1032325]
  5. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1032325] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) protect against HIV-1 infection, yet how they are generated during chronic infection remains unclear. It is known that T follicular helper (T-FH) cells are needed to promote affinitymaturation of B cells during an immune response; however, the role of T-FH during HIV-1 infection is undefined within lymph node germinal centers (GCs). We use nonhuman primates to investigate the relationship in the early stage of chronic SHIVAD8 (simian-humanimmunodeficiency virus AD8) infection between envelope (Env)-specific T-FH cells, Env-specific B cells, virus, and the generation of bNAbs during later infection. Wefound that both the frequency and quality of Envspecific T-FH cells were associated with an expansion of Env-specific immunoglobulin G-positive GC B cells and broader neutralization across HIV clades. We also found a correlation between breadth of neutralization and the degree of somatic hypermutation in Env-specific memory B cells. Finally, we observed high viral loads and greater diversity of Env sequences in rhesus macaques that developed cross-reactive neutralization as compared to those that did not. These studies highlight the importance of boosting high-quality T-FH populations as part of a robust vaccine regimen aimed at eliciting bNabs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available