4.6 Article

Synergistic Effect of Glucagon-Like Peptide 2 (GLP-2) and of Key Growth Factors on the Proliferation of Cultured Rat Astrocytes. Evidence for Reciprocal Upregulation of the mRNAs for GLP-2 and IGF-I Receptors

Journal

MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 2, Pages 183-193

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12035-009-8080-1

Keywords

GLP-2; Growth factors; Insulin; Astrocytes; Proliferation; Gene expression

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this work was to determine whether the stimulating effect of glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-2 on astrocyte proliferation could be reinforced by proliferating substances, including growth factors such as EGF, platelet-derived growth factor, insulin-like growth factor type I (IGF-I) or a hormone such as insulin. Both DNA synthesis and astrocyte density, as well as the expression of c-Fos, Ki-67, proliferating cell nuclear antigen and glial fibrillary acidic proteins, were found to be higher in the presence of GLP-2 than in its absence. In an attempt to get a better understanding of this process, intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) production, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2 phosphorylation and the expression of GLP-2R and IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR) mRNAs were studied in response to growth factors. Our results indicate that, in the presence of different growth factors, GLP-2 does not increase cAMP production but raises ERK 1/2 phosphorylation. In addition, GLP-2R mRNA expression was increased by IGF-I, whilst mRNA expression of IGF-IR was higher in cells incubated with GLP-2 than in control cells. These results suggest for the first time that GLP-2 and several growth factors show synergistic effects on the proliferation of rat astrocytes, a process in which an enhanced expression of GLP-2R and IGF-IR may be involved, providing additional insights into the physiological role of this novel neuropeptide, specially during astroglial regeneration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available