4.6 Review

Modulation of hippocampus-dependent learning and synaptic plasticity by nicotine

Journal

MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages 101-121

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12035-008-8037-9

Keywords

nicotine; hippocampus; learning; LTP; addiction; contextual learning; fear conditioning; nicotinic receptors; acetylcholine

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) [DA017949]
  2. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism [AA015515]
  3. NIDA [DA07237]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A long-standing relationship between nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) and cognition exists. Drugs that act at nAChRs can have cognitive-enhancing effects and diseases that disrupt cognition such as Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia are associated with altered nAChR function. Specifically, hippocampus-dependent learning is particularly sensitive to the effects of nicotine. However, the effects of nicotine on hippocampus-dependent learning vary not only with the doses of nicotine used and whether nicotine is administered acutely, chronically, or withdrawn after chronic nicotine treatment but also vary across different hippocampus-dependent tasks such as the Morris water maze, the radial arm maze, and contextual fear conditioning. In addition, nicotine has variable effects across different types of hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP). Because different types of hippocampus-dependent learning and LTP involve different neural and molecular substrates, comparing the effects of nicotine across these paradigms can yield insights into the mechanisms that may underlie the effects of nicotine on learning and memory and aid in understanding the variable effects of nicotine on cognitive processes. This review compares and contrasts the effects of nicotine on hippocampus-dependent learning and LTP and briefly discusses how the effects of nicotine on learning could contribute to nicotine addiction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available