4.5 Article

Laboratory adapted Escherichia coli K-12 becomes a pathogen of Caenorhabditis elegans upon restoration of O antigen biosynthesis

Journal

MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 87, Issue 5, Pages 939-950

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mmi.12144

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council
  2. BBSRC
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/E021174/1, BB/G012016/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Medical Research Council [G0801209] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. BBSRC [BB/E021174/1, BB/G012016/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. MRC [G0801209] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Escherichia coli has been the leading model organism for many decades. It is a fundamental player in modern biology, facilitating the molecular biology revolution of the last century. The acceptance of E.coli as model organism is predicated primarily on the study of one E. coli lineage; E. coli K-12. However, the antecedents of today's laboratory strains have undergone extensive mutagenesis to create genetically tractable offspring but which resulted in loss of several genetic traits such as O antigen expression. Here we have repaired the wbbL locus, restoring the ability of E. coli K-12 strain MG1655 to express the O antigen. We demonstrate that O antigen production results in drastic alterations of many phenotypes and the density of the O antigen is critical for the observed phenotypes. Importantly, O antigen production enables laboratory strains of E. coli to enter the gut of the Caenorhabditis elegans worm and to kill C. elegans at rates similar to pathogenic bacterial species. We demonstrate C. elegans killing is a feature of other commensal E.coli. We show killing is associated with bacterial resistance to mechanical shear and persistence in the C. elegans gut. These results suggest C. elegans is not an effective model of human-pathogenic E. coli infectious disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available