4.5 Article

An analysis of critical factors for quantitative immunoblotting

Journal

SCIENCE SIGNALING
Volume 8, Issue 371, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.2005966

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [1-R21-AI105970]
  2. American Cancer Society [120668-RSG-11-047-01-DMC]
  3. Pew Charitable Trusts [2008-000410-006]
  4. David and Lucile Packard Foundation [2009-34710]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Immunoblotting (also known as Western blotting) combined with digital image analysis can be a reliable method for analyzing the abundance of proteins and protein modifications, but not every immunoblot-analysis combination produces an accurate result. I illustrate how sample preparation, protocol implementation, detection scheme, and normalization approach profoundly affect the quantitative performance of immunoblotting. This study implemented diagnostic experiments that assess an immunoblot-analysis workflow for accuracy and precision. The results showed that ignoring such diagnostics can lead to pseudoquantitative immunoblot data that markedly overestimate or underestimate true differences in protein abundance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available