4.4 Article

Application of Random Forest and Multiple Linear Regression Techniques to QSPR Prediction of an Aqueous Solubility for Military Compounds

Journal

MOLECULAR INFORMATICS
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages 394-406

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/minf.201000001

Keywords

Environmental chemistry; Structure-property relationships

Funding

  1. USAERDC
  2. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) [BT25-08-41]
  3. Division Of Human Resource Development
  4. Direct For Education and Human Resources [833178] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The relationship between the aqueous solubility of more than two thousand eight hundred organic compounds and their structures was investigated using a QSPR approach based on Simplex Representation of Molecular Structure (SiRMS). The dataset consists of 2537 diverse organic compounds. Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) and Random Forest (RF) methods were used for statistical modeling at the 2D level of representation of molecular structure. Statistical characteristics of the best models are quite good (MLR method: R-2=0.85, Q(2)=0.83; RF method: R-2=0.99, R-oob(2)=0.88). The external validation set of 301 compounds (including 47 nitro-, nitroso- and nitrogen-rich compounds of military interest) which were not included in the training set and modeling process, was used for evaluation of the models predictivity. Thus, well-fitted and robust (R-test(2)(MLR)=0.76 and R-test(2)(RF)=0.82) models were obtained for both statistical techniques using descriptors based on the topological structural information only. The predicted solubility values for military compounds are in good agreement with experimental ones. Developed QSPR models represent powerful and easy-to-use virtual screening tool that can be recommended for prediction of aqueous solubility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available