4.5 Article

Fine mapping of antigenic epitopes on capsid proteins of porcine circovirus, and antigenic phenotype of porcine circovirus Type 2

Journal

MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 3, Pages 327-334

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2008.10.028

Keywords

Porcine circovirus; Capsid protein; Antigenic epitope; Antigenic phenotype

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30625030, 30700025]
  2. Department of Science and Technology of Zhejiang Province [200302012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Type 2 Porcine circovirus (PCV2) is associated with post-weaning multisystemic Wasting syndrome ill Pigs. In this study, three monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against the capsid protein (Cap) of PCV2, eight mAbs to Cap of type 1 porcine circovirus (PCV1) and five mAbs specific for Cap of both PCV1 and PCV2, were generated and used to finely map the antigenic sites of PCV1 and PCV2, and to identify the antigenic phenotype of PCV2 with different length of genome. Five linear B-cell epitopes, including the residues 231-233 and 195-202 specific for PCV2, residues 92-103 specific for PCV1, and residues 156-162 and 175-192 shared between PCV1 and PCV2, were finely defined with synthetic peptides, and-the critical residue in epitope 231-233 and 156-162 was located at residues 233 ((233)Proline) and 156 ((156)Tyrosine), respectively. The conformational epitopes recognized by mAbs with neutralizing activity against both PCV1 and PCV2 were detected in transfected PK-15 and the residues 231-233 also participated in the formation of conformational epitopes. Analysis of antigenic diversity on these epitopes exhibited three antigenic phenotypes of PCV2, (1766)PCV2, (1767)PCV2 and (1768)PCV2 using mAbs. The results from this Study first demonstrated the different antigenic phenotype between PCV2 isolates. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available