4.5 Article

Mannose-binding lectin genotypes are associated with shorter gestational age An evolutionary advantage of low MBL production genotypes?

Journal

MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages 1514-1518

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2007.08.021

Keywords

gestational age; mannose-binding lectin; polymorphisms; preterm birth

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The complement factor mannose-binding lectin (MBL) is associated with adverse pregnancy outcome. MBL serum concentrations are increased from early pregnancy onwards and depend upon several gene polymorphisms. We investigated whether MBL polymorphisms are associated with term and preterm birth, since preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Methods: MBL2 gene polymorphisms were determined in 157 nulliparous women. Considering MBL polymorphisms cases were categorized in groups of high (A), intermediate (B) and low (C) MBL production. Kaplan-Meier survival and multiple linear regression analysis were performed. Results: Women with high MBL genotype group A had a shorter gestational age (274 days +/- S.D. 21) than the women with the intermediate MBL genotype group B (283 days +/- S.D. 12) and the low MBL genotype group C (284 days +/- S.D. 9). This difference in mean gestational age is almost totally attributable to premature births in group A, since 12 of the 14 preterm births were from women with the high MBL genotype group A and only two from the intermediate MBL genotype group B. Conclusions: We found an association between the maternal high MBL genotype group A and premature birth, suggesting that during pregnancy MBL-associated inflammation caused by higher MBL activity may contribute to earlier delivery. Furthermore, this finding might explain why so many individuals are MBL deficient in the general population. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available