4.4 Review

Pharmacokinetic Issues of Imaging with Nanoparticles: Focusing on Carbon Nanotubes and Quantum Dots

Journal

MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages 507-520

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11307-013-0648-5

Keywords

Pharmacokinetics (PK); Molecular imaging; Nanoparticles; Carbon nanotube (CNT); Quantum dot (QD); Cancer; Angiogenesis; Positron emission tomography (PET); Fluorescence

Funding

  1. University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center
  2. National Institutes of Health [1R01CA169365-01A1]
  3. Department of Defense [W81XWH-11-1-0644]
  4. UW Graduate School
  5. UW Department of Radiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With many desirable properties, nanoparticles hold tremendous potential for in vivo molecular imaging and improving the efficacy of small-molecule drugs. The pharmacokinetics (PK) and tissue distribution of nanoparticles largely define their in vivo performance and potential toxicity, which are fundamental issues that need to be elucidated. In this review article, we summarized how molecular imaging techniques (e.g., positron emission tomography, fluorescence imaging, etc.) can facilitate the investigation of PK profiles of nanoparticles using carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and quantum dots (QDs) as representative examples. Different imaging techniques can provide useful insights in monitoring the in vivo behavior and tissue distribution of these nanoparticles, and a number of strategies were utilized to optimize the PK profiles of CNTs and QDs. Based on the available literature reports, it can be concluded that chemical/physical properties of the nanoparticles (e.g., surface functionalization, hydrodynamic size, shape, surface charge, etc.), along with the administration routes/doses, can play critical roles in determining the PK and biodistribution pattern of nanoparticles. Robust chemistry for surface modification of nanoparticles is a prerequisite for successful future biomedical/clinical applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available