4.4 Article

[11C]-DPA-713 and [18F]-DPA-714 as New PET Tracers for TSPO: A Comparison with [11C]-(R)-PK11195 in a Rat Model of Herpes Encephalitis

Journal

MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages 386-398

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11307-009-0211-6

Keywords

Positron emission tomography; Neuroinflammation; Microglia; [C-11]-PK11195; TSPO

Funding

  1. Stanley Medical Research Institute [05-NV-001]
  2. DiMI [LSHB-CT-2005-512146]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Activation of microglia cells plays an important role in neurological diseases. Positron emission tomography (PET) with [C-11]-(R)-PK11195 has already been used to visualize activated microglia cells in neurological diseases. However, [C-11]-(R)-PK11195 may not possess the required sensitivity to visualize mild neuroinflammation. In this study, we evaluated the PET tracers [C-11]-DPA-713 and [F-18]-DPA-714 as agents for imaging of activated microglia in a rat model of herpes encephalitis. Materials and Methods: Rats were intranasally inoculated with HSV-1. On day 6 or 7 after inoculation, small animal PET studies were performed to compare [C-11]-(R)-PK11195, [C-11]-DPA-713, and [F-18]-DPA-714. Results: Uptake of [C-11]-DPA-713 in infected brain areas was comparable to that of [C-11]-(R)-PK11195, but [C-11]-DPA-713 showed lower non-specific binding. Non-specific uptake of [F-18]-DPA-714 was lower than that of [C-11]-(R)-PK11195. In the infected brain, total [F-18]-DPA-714 uptake was lower than that of [C-11]-(R)-PK11195, with comparable specific uptake. Conclusions: [C-11]-DPA-713 may be more suitable for visualizing mild inflammation than [C-11]-(R)-PK11195. In addition, the fact that [F-18]-DPA-714 is an agonist PET tracer opens new possibilities to evaluate different aspects of neuroinflammation. Therefore, both tracers warrant further investigation in animal models and in a clinical setting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available