4.7 Article

Potential ecological risk of hazardous elements in different land-use urban soils of Bangladesh

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 512, Issue -, Pages 94-102

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.100

Keywords

Ecological risk; Hazardous elements; Urban land use; Bangladesh

Funding

  1. Leadership Program in Sustainable Living with Environmental Risk (SLER) at Yokohama National University under the aid of Strategic Funds for the Promotion of Science and Technology from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  2. Research Collaboration Promotion Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soil pollution, influenced by both the natural and anthropogenic factors, significantly reduces environmental quality. In this study, six hazardous elements (Cr, Ni, Cu, As, Cd and Pb) in 12 different land-use urban soils from Bangladesh were assessed. The ranges of Cr, Ni, Cu, As, Cd and Pb in studied soils were 2.4-1258, 831044, 9.7-823, 8.7-277, 1.8-80 and 13-842 mg/kg, respectively. More than 70% of soil samples exceeded the Dutch target value for Ni, Cu, As, Cd and Pb concentration in soil, indicating a potential risk to the environment Certain indices, including the enrichment factor (EF), pollution load index (PLI) and contamination factor (C-f(i)), were used to assess the ecological risk posed by hazardous elements in soils. The mean range of PLI was 1.5-10, indicating progressive deterioration of soil due to metal contamination. However, the C-f(i) values of Cd ranged from 3.7 to 35 revealed that the examined soils were strongly impacted by Cd. Considering the severity of potential ecological risk for single metal (E-r(i)), the descending order of contaminants was Cd > As > Cu> Pb > Ni > Cr. In view of the potential ecological risk (PER), soils from all land uses showed considerable to very high potential ecological risk. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available