4.5 Article

Effects of Sangrovit-supplemented diet on growth performance, blood biochemical parameters, survival and stress resistance to salinity in the Caspian roach (Rutilus rutilus) fry

Journal

AQUACULTURE RESEARCH
Volume 47, Issue 9, Pages 2874-2880

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/are.12737

Keywords

growth; stress; blood; Sangrovit; Caspian roach

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study was carried out to show the effects of Sangrovit on growth, blood biochemical parameters, survival and resistance to salinity stress in the Caspian roach. Fish (1.24 +/- 0.13g) were divided into four groups fed diets containing Sangrovit at different levels: 0 (control), 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15% for 45days. The results showed that there was a significant increase in final weight, weight gain and specific growth rate in those fish fed 0.15% Sangrovit diets compared with the control (P<0.05). Food conversion rate of fish fed 0.05% Sangrovit diet was significantly (P<0.05) lower than the control group. Condition factor was not significantly affected by Sangrovit dosage (P>0.05). The blood glucose and cholesterol levels were significantly lower in treated groups compared with the control (P<0.05). The highest total protein was obtained in the 0.15% group and it was significantly higher than in all other groups (P<0.05). Challenges were carried out after 45days of feeding, to determine the effect of Sangrovit on resistance to salinity stress. Blood samples were obtained four times after challenge (day 1, 3, 5 and 7) for evaluate haematocrit levels. On the first day, haematocrit increased significantly in all groups compared to day 5 and 7 (P<0.05). The haematocrit levels decreased gradually in all groups from the third day. Before andafter stress, no differences were observed for survival rate among the experimental diets (P>0.05). These results indicate that the inclusion of 0.15% Sangrovit in the diet of the Caspian roach enhances feed efficiency, fish growth and blood biochemical parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available