3.9 Article

Altered selectivity of parathyroid hormone (PTH) and PTH-Related protein (PTHrP) for distinct conformations of the PTH/PTHrP receptor

Journal

MOLECULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 156-166

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1210/me.2007-0274

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [P01 DK011794, DK-11794] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [P01DK011794] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PTH and PTHrP use the same G protein-coupled receptor, the PTH/PTHrP receptor (PTHR), to mediate their distinct biological actions. The extent to which the mechanisms by which the two ligands bind to the PTHR differ is unclear. We examined this question using several pharmacological and biophysical approaches. Kinetic dissociation and equilibrium binding assays revealed that the binding of [I-125] PTHrP(1-36) to the PTHR was more sensitive to GTP gamma S (added to functionally uncouple PTHR-G protein complexes) than was the binding of [I-125] PTH(1-34) (similar to 75% maximal inhibition vs. similar to 20%). Fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based kinetic analyses revealed that PTHrP(1-36) bound to the PTHR more slowly and dissociated from it more rapidly than did PTH(1-34). The cAMP signaling response capacity of PTHrP(1-36) in cells decayed more rapidly than did that of PTH(1-34) (t(1/2) = similar to 1 vs. similar to 2 h). Divergent residue 5 in the ligand, IIe in PTH and His in PTHrP, was identified as a key determinant of the altered receptor-interaction responses exhibited by the two peptides. We conclude that whereas PTH and PTHrP bind similarly to the G protein-coupled PTHR conformation (RG), PTH has a greater capacity to bind to the G protein-uncoupled conformation (R-0) and, hence, can produce cumulatively greater signaling responses (via R(0 ->)RG isomerization) than can PTHrP. Such conformational selectivity may relate to the distinct modes by which PTH and PTHrP act biologically, endocrine vs. paracrine, and may help explain reported differences in the effects that the ligands have on calcium and bone metabolism when administered to humans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available