4.7 Article

Extensive paternal mtDNA leakage in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster

Journal

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages 2106-2117

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mec.12256

Keywords

Drosophila melanogaster; heteroplasmy; mtDNA diversity; paternal leakage; recombination

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Funds (FWF) [P19467]
  2. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P19467] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 19467] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Strict maternal inheritance is considered a hallmark of animal mtDNA. Although recent reports suggest that paternal leakage occurs in a broad range of species, it is still considered an exceptionally rare event. To evaluate the impact of paternal leakage on the evolution of mtDNA, it is essential to reliably estimate the frequency of paternal leakage in natural populations. Using allele-specific real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), we show that heteroplasmy is common in natural populations with at least 14% of the individuals carrying multiple mitochondrial haplotypes. However, the average frequency of the minor mtDNA haplotype is low (0.8%), which suggests that this pervasive heteroplasmy has not been noticed before due to a lack of power in sequencing surveys. Based on the distribution of mtDNA haplotypes in the offspring of heteroplasmic mothers, we found no evidence for strong selection against one of the haplotypes. We estimated that the rate of paternal leakage is 6% and that at least 100 generations are required for complete sorting of mtDNA haplotypes. Despite the high proportion of heteroplasmic individuals in natural populations, we found no evidence for recombination between mtDNA molecules, suggesting that either recombination is rare or recombinant haplotypes are counter-selected. Our results indicate that evolutionary studies using mtDNA as a marker might be biased by paternal leakage in this species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available