4.7 Article

Cryptic introductions and the interpretation of island biodiversity

Journal

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages 2313-2324

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mec.12236

Keywords

Bermuda; cryptogenic; eastern bluebird; island; microsatellite; non-native

Funding

  1. The Bermuda Audubon Society
  2. Rutgers School of Environmental and Biological Sciences
  3. Rutgers Graduate Program in Ecology and Evolution

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Species with cryptic origins (i.e. those that cannot be reliably classed as native or non-native) present a particular challenge to our understanding of the generation and maintenance of biodiversity. Such species may be especially common on islands given that some islands have had a relatively recent history of human settlement. It is likely that select island species considered native might have achieved their current distributions via direct or indirect human actions. As an example, we explore the origins of eastern bluebirds (Sialia sialis bermudensis) on the island of Bermuda. Considered native to the island and a distinct subspecies, this population has diverged in morphology relative to mainland North America. Using microsatellite markers and simulation of island colonization, we show that the Bermuda population of bluebirds is the likely result of a single colonization event that occurred during the 1600s, making this a cryptic invader. To our knowledge, this is one of the youngest examples of a terrestrial vertebrate cryptic invader. We suggest that the eastern bluebird is not an isolated case of cryptic invader on either Bermuda or elsewhere and that caution be exercised when studying present-day distributions of organisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available