4.7 Article

Cultivation shapes genetic novelty in a globally important invader

Journal

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages 3187-3199

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05601.x

Keywords

Acacia saligna; biological invasions; chloroplast capture; genetic novelty; introgression; tree invasions

Funding

  1. DST-NRF Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology
  2. Working for Water Programme through the collaborative research project on 'Research for Integrated Management of Invasive Alien Species'
  3. National Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acacia saligna is a species complex that has become invasive in a number of countries worldwide where it has caused substantial environmental and economic impacts. Understanding genetic and other factors contributing to its success may allow managers to limit future invasions of closely related species. We used three molecular markers to compare the introduced range (South Africa) to the native range (Western Australia). Nuclear markers showed that invasive populations are divergent from native populations and most closely related to a cultivated population in Western Australia. We also found incongruence between nuclear and chloroplast data that, together with the long history of cultivation of the species, suggest that introgressive hybridization (coupled with chloroplast capture) may have occurred within A.similar to saligna. While we could not definitively prove introgression, the genetic distance between cultivated and native A.similar to saligna populations was comparable to known interspecific divergences among other Acacia species. Therefore, cultivation, multiple large-scale introductions and possibly introgressive hybridization have rapidly given rise to the divergent genetic entity present in South Africa. This may explain the known global variation in invasiveness and inaccuracy of native bioclimatic models in predicting potential distributions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available