4.7 Article

Genetic association of physically unlinked islands of genomic divergence in incipient species of Anopheles gambiae

Journal

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages 925-939

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04531.x

Keywords

centromeres; divergent adaptation; ecological speciation; malaria vector; reproductive isolation; speciation islands

Funding

  1. NIH [AI63508]
  2. University of Notre Dame
  3. Indiana Genomics Initiative of Indiana University (INGEN)
  4. Lily Endowment, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous efforts to uncover the genetic underpinnings of ongoing ecological speciation of the M and S forms of the African malaria vector Anopheles gambiae revealed two centromere-proximal islands of genetic divergence on X and chromosome 2. Under the assumption of considerable ongoing gene flow between M and S, these persistently divergent genomic islands were widely considered to be 'speciation islands'. In the course of microarray-based divergence mapping, we discovered a third centromere-associated island of divergence on chromosome 3, which was validated by targeted re-sequencing. To test for genetic association between the divergence islands on all three chromosomes, SNP-based assays were applied in four natural populations of M and S spanning West, Central and East Africa. Genotyping of 517 female M and S mosquitoes revealed nearly complete linkage disequilibrium between the centromeres of the three independently assorting chromosomes. These results suggest that despite the potential for inter-form gene flow through hybridization, actual (realized) gene flow between M and S may be substantially less than commonly assumed and may not explain most shared variation. Moreover, the possibility of very low gene flow calls into question whether diverged pericentromeric regions-characterized by reduced levels of variation and recombination-are in fact instrumental rather than merely incidental to the speciation process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available