4.7 Article

Range expansion and hybridization in Round Island petrels (Pterodroma spp.): evidence from microsatellite genotypes

Journal

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 15, Pages 3157-3170

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04719.x

Keywords

dispersal; hybridization; microsatellites; Pterodroma arminjoniana; Pterodroma neglecta; vocalizations

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council
  2. Zoological Society of London
  3. University of London Central Research Fund
  4. CAPES foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Historical records suggest that the petrels of Round Island (near Mauritius, Indian Ocean) represent a recent, long-distance colonization by species originating from the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. The majority of petrels on Round Island appear most similar to Pterodroma arminjoniana, a species whose only other breeding locality is Trindade Island in the South Atlantic. Using nine microsatellite loci, patterns of genetic differentiation in petrels from Round and Trindade Islands were analysed. The two populations exhibit low but significant levels of differentiation in allele frequencies and estimates of migration rate between islands using genetic data are also low, supporting the hypothesis that these populations have recently separated but are now isolated from one another. A second population of petrels, most similar in appearance to the Pacific species P. neglecta, is also present on Round Island and observations suggest that the two petrel species are hybridizing. Vocalizations recorded on the island also suggest that hybrid birds may be present within the population. Data from microsatellite genotypes support this hypothesis and indicate that there may have been many generations of hybridization and back-crossing between P. arminjoniana and P. neglecta on Round Island. Our results provide an insight into the processes of dispersal and the consequences of secondary contact in Procellariiformes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available