4.7 Article

Biodiversity in microbial communities: system scale patterns and mechanisms

Journal

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages 1455-1462

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04128.x

Keywords

biodiversity; disturbance; microbial diversity; richness maintenance

Funding

  1. NSF [DEB-021212487]
  2. USDA CSREES [2006-34526-17001]
  3. Utah Agricultural Experiment Station at Utah State University [8051]
  4. National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The relationship between anthropogenic impact and the maintenance of biodiversity is a fundamental question in ecology. The emphasis on the organizational level of biodiversity responsible for ecosystem processes is shifting from a species-centred focus to include genotypic diversity. The relationship between biodiversity measures at these two scales remains largely unknown. By stratifying anthropogenic effects between scales of biodiversity of bacterial communities, we show a statistically significant difference in diversity based on taxonomic scale. Communities with intermediate species richness show high genotypic diversity while speciose and species-poor communities do not. We propose that in species-poor communities, generally comprising stable yet harsh conditions, physiological tolerance and competitive trade-offs limit both the number of species that occur and the loss of genotypes due to decreases in already constrained fitness. In species-rich communities, natural environmental conditions result in well-defined community structure and resource partitioning. Disturbance of these communities disrupts niche space, resulting in lower genotypic diversity despite the maintenance of species diversity. Our work provides a model to inform future research about relationships between species and genotypic biodiversity based on determining the biodiversity consequences of changing environmental context.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available