4.7 Article

The joint return period analysis of natural disasters based on monitoring and statistical modeling of multidimensional hazard factors

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 538, Issue -, Pages 724-732

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.093

Keywords

Natural hazard; Hazard factor; Formation mechanism; Multidimensional return period; Risk assessment

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41301583, 41171401, 41306091, 41306087]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology [2013-KF-09]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2014M551115]
  5. Marine Public Projects [201505019, 201505005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As a random event, a natural disaster has the complex occurrence mechanism. The comprehensive analysis of multiple hazard factors is important in disaster risk assessment. In order to improve the accuracy of risk analysis and forecasting, the formation mechanism of a disaster should be considered in the analysis and calculation of multi-factors. Based on the consideration of the importance and deficiencies of multivariate analysis of dust storm disasters, 91 severe dust storm disasters in Inner Mongolia from 1990 to 2013 were selected as study cases in the paper. Main hazard factors from 500-hPa atmospheric circulation system, near-surface meteorological system, and underlying surface conditions were selected to simulate and calculate the multidimensional joint return periods. After comparing the simulation results with actual dust storm events in 54 years, we found that the two-dimensional Frank Copula function showed the better fitting results at the lower tail of hazard factors and that three-dimensional Frank Copula function displayed the better fitting results at the middle and upper tails of hazard factors. However, for dust storm disasters with the short return period, three-dimensional joint return period simulation shows no obvious advantage. If the return period is longer than 10 years, it shows significant advantages in extreme value fitting. Therefore, we suggest the multivariate analysis method may be adopted in forecasting and risk analysis of serious disasters with the longer return period, such as earthquake and tsunami. Furthermore, the exploration of this method laid the foundation for the prediction and warning of other nature disasters. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available