4.7 Article

Pollution control enhanced spruce growth in the Black Triangle near the Czech-Polish border

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 538, Issue -, Pages 703-711

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.105

Keywords

Air pollution; Central Europe; Dendroecology; Forest growth; Norway spruce

Funding

  1. European Social Fund
  2. state budget of the Czech Republic, Project Indicators of Tree Vitality [CZ.1.07/2.3.00/20.0265]
  3. Czech Republic Grant Agency [13-04291S]
  4. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of CR within the National Sustainability Program I (NPU I) [LO1415]
  5. Establishment of International Scientific Team Focused on Drought Research [OP VK CZ.1.07/2.3.00/20.0248]
  6. Frameworks and possibilities of forest adaptation measures and strategies connected with Climate change [EHP-CZ02-OV-1-019-2014]
  7. Czech Science Foundation [14-33311S, 15-08124S]
  8. People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the EU 7FP under REA grant [PCIG13-GA-2013-618430]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) stands in certain areas of Central Europe have experienced substantial dieback since the 1970s. Understanding the reasons for this decline and reexamining the response of forests to acid deposition reduction remains challenging because of a lack of long and well-replicated tree-ring width chronologies. Here, spruce from a subalpine area heavily affected by acid deposition (from both sulfur and nitrogen compounds) is evaluated. Tree-ring width measurements from 98 trees between 1000 and 1350 m above sea level (a.s.l.) reflected significant May-July temperature signals. Since the 1970s, acid deposition has reduced the growth-climate relationship. Efficient pollution control together with a warmer but not drier climate most likely caused the increased growth of spruce stands in this region, the so-called Black Triangle, in the 1990s. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available