4.7 Article

Mating system variability in a mouthbrooding cichlid fish from a tropical lake

Journal

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 16, Pages 3508-3517

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04295.x

Keywords

Cichlidae; Ctenochromis horei; mate monopolization; mating system; multiple paternity; polyandry

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Foundation [P17380-B06, P20883]
  2. Karl-Franzens-University
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P17380] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intraspecific variability in mating behaviour and disparities between social and reproductive behaviour add complexity to the description of animal mating systems. A previously published field study on a population of the maternally mouthbrooding cichlid fish Ctenochromis horei in the north of Lake Tanganyika suggested mate monopolization by the most dominant male. In the present study, genetic reconstructions of paternity in a population in the south of the lake provided no evidence for male mate monopolization, as none of the inferred sires had offspring in more than one brood. The ability to reconstruct sire genotypes from offspring alleles was confirmed by computer simulations. Multiple paternity occurred in several broods and was significantly more frequent in the sample taken in the rainy season than in the dry season sample (100% of broods vs. 14%, respectively; P = 0.005). The data suggest geographical and temporal variation in the mating behaviour of C. horei despite its continuous year-round reproduction, invariable brood care behaviour and habitat-specific distribution in the relatively constant and confined environment of a tropical lake. Moreover, our data show that inferences on the distribution of male reproductive success, if based on each geographical or temporal data set alone, would fail to describe the potential for sexual selection in this species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available