4.3 Article

Previstage™ GCC Colorectal Cancer Staging Test A New Molecular Test to Identify Lymph Node Metastases and Provide More Accurate Information about the Stage of Patients with Colorectal Cancer

Journal

MOLECULAR DIAGNOSIS & THERAPY
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 11-14

Publisher

ADIS INT LTD
DOI: 10.1007/BF03256309

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and a leading cause of death for both men and women in North America. The staging of the CRC at the time of diagnosis is the single most important prognostic factor in determining recurrence and Survival. Until 2008, accurate evaluation or CRC stages I and II wits based on examination of regional lymph nodes (LNs) under it microscope to identify cancer cells. This method can detect one cancer cell in 200 normal cells, but analyzes only a fraction or the available tissue from the LN (less than 0.1%). Up to 30% of patients assessed by traditional histopathology methods as having stage II disease (negative LNs) experience a recurrence of their cancer. Previstage (TM) GCC Colorectal Cancer Staging Test, a new molecular diagnostic test, is able to identify patients at high risk of recurrence by examining their LNs for guanylyl cyclase C (GCC). GCC is a marker found in cells lining the lumen of the gastrointestinal tract. The expression of GCC is conserved in CRC and metastatic disease. Using an ultrasensitive quantitative reverse transcription (RT)-PCR, the test interrogates a patient's LN tissues to identify GCC levels consistent with metastatic (stage III) disease. The technology employed in Previstage (TM) GCC is nearly 100 000 times more sensitive than microscopic staging methods. This molecular diagnostic test allows a more thorough examination or LNs and has an analytic sensitivity of 92% and it specificity of 98%. Such it test can be used to overcome the limitations of staging by traditional histopathology alone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available