4.8 Article

Identification of a Major Determinant for Serine-Threonine Kinase Phosphoacceptor Specificity

Journal

MOLECULAR CELL
Volume 53, Issue 1, Pages 140-147

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.11.013

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 GM102262, R01 GM105947, R01 GM083025, YG-001-011]
  2. National Institutes of Health [T32 CA009085]
  3. SGC
  4. Canadian Institutes for Health Research [1097737]
  5. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  6. Genome Canada
  7. GlaxoSmithKline
  8. Pfizer
  9. Eli Lilly
  10. Takeda
  11. AbbVie
  12. Novartis Research Foundation
  13. Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation
  14. Wellcome Trust [092809/Z/10/Z, 095751/Z/11/Z]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Eukaryotic protein kinases are generally classified as being either tyrosine or serine-threonine specific. Though not evident from inspection of their primary sequences, many serine-threonine kinases display a significant preference for serine or threonine as the phosphoacceptor residue. Here we show that a residue located in the kinase activation segment, which we term the DFG+1 residue, acts as a major determinant for serine-threonine phosphorylation site specificity. Mutation of this residue was sufficient to switch the phosphorylation site preference for multiple kinases, including the serine-specific kinase PAK4 and the threonine-specific kinase MST4. Kinetic analysis of peptide substrate phosphorylation and crystal structures of PAK4-peptide complexes suggested that phosphoacceptor residue preference is not mediated by stronger binding of the favored substrate. Rather, favored kinase-phosphoacceptor combinations likely promote a conformation optimal for catalysis. Understanding the rules governing kinase phosphoacceptor preference allows kinases to be classified as serine or threonine specific based on their sequence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available