4.8 Article

A Global Regulatory Mechanism for Activating an Exon Network Required for Neurogenesis

Journal

MOLECULAR CELL
Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages 90-103

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.08.011

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  2. ORF
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Polyani Award
  4. Spanish Government
  5. Sandra Ibarra Foundation for Cancer
  6. NSERC
  7. University of Toronto
  8. Human Frontiers Science Program Organization
  9. EMBO
  10. [BIO2011-23920]
  11. [CSD2009-00080]
  12. ICREA Funding Source: Custom
  13. Medical Research Council [MC_U105185858, MC_U105178934] Funding Source: researchfish
  14. MRC [MC_U105185858, MC_U105178934] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The vertebrate and neural-specific Ser/Arg (SR)related protein nSR100/SRRM4 regulates an extensive program of alternative splicing with critical roles in nervous system development. However, the mechanism by which nSR100 controls its target exons is poorly understood. We demonstrate that nSR100-dependent neural exons are associated with a unique configuration of intronic cis-elements that promote rapid switch-like regulation during neurogenesis. A key feature of this configuration is the insertion of specialized intronic enhancers between polypyrimidine tracts and acceptor sites that bind nSR100 to potently activate exon inclusion in neural cells while weakening 30 splice site recognition and contributing to exon skipping in nonneural cells. nSR100 further operates by forming multiple interactions with early spliceosome components bound proximal to 30 splice sites. These multifaceted interactions achieve dominance over neural exon silencing mediated by the splicing regulator PTBP1. The results thus illuminate a widespread mechanism by which a critical neural exon network is activated during neurogenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available