4.8 Article

Proteome-wide Identification of Poly(ADP-Ribosyl)ation Targets in Different Genotoxic Stress Responses

Journal

MOLECULAR CELL
Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages 272-285

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.08.026

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NNF-CPR
  2. Lundbeck Foundation
  3. European Union [262067]
  4. EURAtrans [HEALTH-F4-2010-241504]
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation [310030B_138667]
  6. Kanton of Zurich
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [310030B_138667] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
  8. Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research [PI Jiri Lukas, PI Michael Lund Nielsen] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Poly(ADP-ribos)ylation (PARylation) is a reversible posttranslational modification found in higher eukaryotes. However, little is known about PARylation acceptor proteins. Here, we describe a sensitive proteomics approach based on high-accuracy quantitative mass spectrometry for the identification of PARylated proteins induced under different cellular stress conditions. While confirming the majority of known PARylated substrates, our screen identifies numerous additional PARylation targets. In vivo and in vitro validation of acceptor proteins confirms that our methodology targets covalent PARylation. Nuclear proteins encompassing nucleic acid binding properties are prominently PARylated upon genotoxic stress, consistent with the nuclear localization of ARTD1/PARP1 and ARTD2/PARP2. Distinct differences in proteins becoming PARylated upon various genotoxic insults are observed, exemplified by the PARylation of RNA-processing factors THRAP3 and TAF15 under oxidative stress. High-content imaging reveals that PARylation affects the nuclear relocalization of THRAP3 and TAF15, demonstrating the potential of our approach to uncover hitherto unappreciated processes being controlled by specific genotoxic-stress-induced PARylation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available