4.8 Article

Regulation of DNA-End Resection by hnRNPU-like Proteins Promotes DNA Double-Strand Break Signaling and Repair

Journal

MOLECULAR CELL
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages 505-516

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.12.035

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Cancer Research UK (CRUK)
  2. European Union FP7 (GENICA)
  3. European Research Council
  4. Wellcome Trust
  5. University of Cambridge
  6. Medical Research Council
  7. Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg
  8. Bundesministerium far Gesundheit
  9. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  10. Human Frontier Science Program Organization
  11. Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer
  12. Marie Curie IEF
  13. University of Birmingham Medical School
  14. MRC [G0900088] Funding Source: UKRI
  15. Cancer Research UK [11224, 13030] Funding Source: researchfish
  16. Medical Research Council [G0900088] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

DNA double-strand break (DSB) signaling and repair are critical for cell viability, and rely on highly coordinated pathways whose molecular organization is still incompletely understood. Here, we show that heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein U-like (hnRNPUL) proteins 1 and 2 play key roles in cellular responses to DSBs. We identify human hnRNPUL1 and -2 as binding partners for the DSB sensor complex MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 (MRN) and demonstrate that hnRNPUL1 and -2 are recruited to DNA damage in an interdependent manner that requires MRN. Moreover, we show that hnRNPUL1 and -2 stimulate DNA-end resection and promote ATR-dependent signaling and DSB repair by homologous recombination, thereby contributing to cell survival upon exposure to DSB-inducing agents. Finally, we establish that hnRNPUL1 and -2 function downstream of MRN and CtBP-interacting protein (CtIP) to promote recruitment of the BLM helicase to DNA breaks. Collectively, these results provide insights into how mammalian cells respond to DSBs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available