4.8 Article

Complex Inhibitory Effects of Nitric Oxide on Autophagy

Journal

MOLECULAR CELL
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages 19-32

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.04.029

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Hughes Hall Research Fellowship
  2. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Addenbrooke's Hospital and MRC
  3. Action Medical Research Training Fellowship
  4. Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, Agence Nationale pour la Recherche, AXA Chair for Longevity Research
  5. Wellcome Trust
  6. Medical Research Council
  7. Sackler Trust
  8. National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Addenbrooke's Hospital
  9. MRC [G0600194, G0901339] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Medical Research Council [G0600194, G0901339] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Autophagy, a major degradation process for long-lived and aggregate-prone proteins, affects various human processes, such as development, immunity, cancer, and neurodegeneration. Several autophagy regulators have been identified in recent years. Here we show that nitric oxide (NO), a potent cellular messenger, inhibits autophagosome synthesis via a number of mechanisms. NO impairs autophagy by inhibiting the activity of S-nitrosylation substrates, JNK1 and IKK beta. Inhibition of JNK1 by NO reduces Bcl-2 phosphorylation and increases the Bcl-2-Beclin 1 interaction, thereby disrupting hVps34/Beclin 1 complex formation. Additionally, NO inhibits IKK beta and reduces AMPK phosphorylation, leading to mTORC1 activation via TSC2. Overexpression of nNOS, iNOS, or eNOS impairs autophagosome formation primarily via the JNK1-Bcl-2 pathway. Conversely, NOS inhibition enhances the clearance of autophagic substrates and reduces neurodegeneration in models of Huntington's disease. Our data suggest that nitrosative stress-mediated protein aggregation in neurodegenerative diseases may be, in part, due to autophagy inhibition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available