4.8 Article

Coordination of Structure-Specific Nucleases by Human SLX4/BTBD12 Is Required for DNA Repair

Journal

MOLECULAR CELL
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 116-127

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.06.020

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. BBSRC [BB/E001777/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. MRC [MC_U127070192, MC_U137761446] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/E001777/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Medical Research Council [MC_U127070192, MC_U137761446] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/E001777/1] Funding Source: Medline
  6. Cancer Research UK [11722] Funding Source: Medline
  7. Medical Research Council [MC_U127070192, MC_U137761446] Funding Source: Medline
  8. Worldwide Cancer Research [06-0091] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Budding yeast Slx4 interacts with the structure-specific endonuclease Slx1 to ensure completion of ribosomal DNA replication. Slx4 also interacts with the Rad1-Rad10 endonuclease to control cleavage of 3' flaps during repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs). Here we describe the identification of human SLX4, a scaffold for DNA repair nucleases XPF-ERCC1, MUS81-EME1, and SLX1. SLX4 immunoprecipitates show SLX1-dependent nuclease activity toward Holliday junctions and MUS81-dependent activity toward other branched DNA structures. Furthermore, SLX4 enhances the nuclease activity of SLX1, MUS81, and XPF. Consistent with a role in processing recombination intermediates, cells depleted of SLX4 are hypersensitive to genotoxins that cause DSBs and show defects in the resolution of interstrand crosslink-induced DSBs. Depletion of SLX4 causes a decrease in DSB-induced homologous recombination. These data show that SLX4 is a regulator of structure-specific nucleases and that SLX4 and SLX1 are important regulators of genome stability in human cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available