4.6 Article

Targeted Inhibition of ULK1 Promotes Apoptosis and Suppresses Tumor Growth and Metastasis in Neuroblastoma

Journal

MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages 2365-2376

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-18-0176

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [CA171501, GM117014]
  2. Lois High Berstler Research Endowment Fund
  3. Four Diamonds Fund of the Pennsylvania State University
  4. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R21CA171501] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM117014] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid malignancy in the pediatric population, accounting for over 9% of all cancer-related deaths in children. Autophagy is a cell self-protective mechanism that promotes tumor cell growth and survival, making it an attractive target for treating cancer. However, the role of autophagy in neuroblastoma tumor growth and metastasis is largely undefined. Here we demonstrate that targeted inhibition of an essential autophagy kinase, unc-51 like autophagy kinase 1 (ULK1), with a recently developed small-molecule inhibitor of ULK1, SBI-0206965, significantly reduces cell growth and promotes apoptosis in SK-N-AS, SH-SY5Y, and SK-N-DZ neuroblastoma cell lines. Furthermore, inhibition of ULK1 by a dominant-negative mutant of ULK1 (dnULK1(K46N)) significantly reduces growth and metastatic disease and prolongs survival of mice bearing SK-N-AS xenograft tumors. We also show that SB1-0206965 sensitizes SK-N-AS cells to TRAIL treatment, but not to mTOR inhibitors (INK128, Torin1) or topoisomerase inhibitors (doxorubicin, topotecan). Collectively, these findings demonstrate that ULK1 is a viable drug target and suggest that inhibitors of ULK1 may provide a novel therapeutic option for the treatment of neuroblastoma. (C) 2018 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available