4.6 Article

Development of Gene Expression-Based Score to Predict Sensitivity of Multiple Myeloma Cells to DNA Methylation Inhibitors

Journal

MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages 2685-2692

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-0721

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. ARC (Paris, France) [SL220110603450]
  2. European Community (FP7- OVERMYR)
  3. Hopp-Foundation, Germany
  4. University of Heidelberg, Germany
  5. National Centre for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
  6. Tumorzentrum Heidelberg/Mannheim, Germany
  7. Deutsche Krebshilfe, Bonn, Germany
  8. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bonn, Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multiple myeloma is a plasma cell cancer with poor survival, characterized by the clonal expansion of multiple myeloma cells (MMC), primarily in the bone marrow. Novel compounds are currently tested in this disease, but partial or minor patients' responses are observed for most compounds used as a single agent. The design of predictors for drug efficacy could be most useful to better understand basic mechanisms targeted by these drugs and design clinical trials. In the current study, we report the building of a DNA methylation score (DM score) predicting the efficacy of decitabine, an inhibitor of DNA methyltransferase (DNMT), targeting methylation-regulated gene expression. DMscore was built by identifying 47 genes regulated by decitabine in human myeloma cell lines and the expression of which in primary MMCs of previously untreated patients is predictive for overall survival. A high DM score predicts patients' poor survival, and, of major interest, high sensitivity of primary MMCs or human myeloma cell lines to decitabine in vitro. Thus, DMscore could be useful to design novel treatments with DMNT inhibitor in multiple myeloma and has highlighted 47 genes, the gene products of which could be important for multiple myeloma disease development. Mol Cancer Ther; 11(12); 2685-92. (C)2012 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available