4.6 Article

Identification of c-Src as a Potential Therapeutic Target for Gastric Cancer and of MET Activation as a Cause of Resistance to c-Src Inhibition

Journal

MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages 1188-1197

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-10-0002

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Therapeutic strategies that target c-Src hold promise for a wide variety of cancers. We have now investigated both the effects of dasatinib, which inhibits the activity of c-Src and several other kinases, on cell growth as well as the mechanism of dasatinib resistance in human gastric cancer cell lines. Immunoblot analysis revealed the activation of c-Src at various levels in most gastric cancer cell lines examined. Dasatinib inhibited the phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and induced G(1) arrest, as revealed by flow cytometry, in a subset of responsive cell lines. In other responsive cell lines, dasatinib inhibited both ERK and AKT phosphorylation and induced apoptosis, as revealed by an increase in caspase-3 activity and cleavage of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Depletion of c-Src by RNA interference also induced G(1) arrest or apoptosis in dasatinib-responsive cell lines, indicating that the antiproliferative effect of dasatinib is attributable to c-Src inhibition. Gastric cancer cell lines positive for the activation of MET were resistant to dasatinib. Dasatinib had no effect on ERK or AKT signaling, whereas the MET inhibitor PHA-665752 induced apoptosis in these cells. The subsets of gastric cancer cells defined by a response to c-Src or MET inhibitors were distinct and nonoverlapping. Our results suggest that c-Src is a promising target for the treatment of gastric cancer and that analysis of MET amplification might optimize patient selection for treatment with c-Src inhibitors. Mol Cancer Ther; 9(5); 1188-97. (C) 2010 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available