4.6 Article

Inhibition of DNA binding of the NF-Y transcription factor by the pyrrolobenzodiazepine-polyamide conjugate GWL-78

Journal

MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages 1319-1328

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-07-0475

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. MRC [G0000168] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [G0000168] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Cancer Research UK [C2559/A3083] Funding Source: Medline
  4. Medical Research Council [G0000168] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many genes involved in cell cycle control have promoters that bind the heterotrimeric transcription factor NF-Y. Several minor-groove binding drugs have been shown to block interactions of transcription factors with cognate DNA-binding sequences. We showed previously that noncovalent minor-groove binding agents block interactions of NF-Y with the promoter of topoisomerase II alpha (topo II alpha). In this study, we investigated the ability of GWL-78, a pyrrolobenzodiazepine-poly(N-methylpyrrole) conjugate, to inhibit the binding of NF-Y to DNA. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays showed that GWL-78 could displace NF-Y bound to several CCAAT motifs within promoters of genes involved in cell cycle progression. DNase I footprinting of the topo II alpha promoter confirmed binding of GWL-78 to AT-rich sequences corresponding to the preferred binding site of NF-Y. Incubation with GWL-78 resulted in displacement of NF-Y binding to DNA. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays on the topo II alpha promoter showed that GWL-78 was able to enter the nucleus and interact with specific DNA sequences. Treatment of NIH3T3 cells with GWL-78 resulted in a block of cell cycle progression, which did not involve activation of p53. Thus, agents such as GWL-78 may be useful in modulating transcription and blocking cellular proliferation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available