4.5 Article

Functional Characterization of a Cancer Causing Mutation in Human Replication Protein A

Journal

MOLECULAR CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages 1017-1026

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-10-0161

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. American Heart Association [09PRE2160147]
  2. NIH [GM44721]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Replication protein A (RPA) is the primary ssDNA-binding protein in eukaryotes. RPA is essential for DNA replication, repair, and recombination. Mutation of a conserved leucine residue to proline in the high-affinity DNA binding site of RPA (residue L221 in human RPA) has been shown to have defects in DNA repair and a high rate of chromosomal rearrangements in yeast. The homologous mutation in mice was found to be lethal when homozygous and to cause high rates of cancer when heterozygous. To understand the molecular defect causing these phenotypes, we created the homologous mutation in the human RPA1 gene (L221P) and analyzed its properties in cells and in vitro. RPA1(L221P) does not support cell cycle progression when it is the only form of RPA1 in HeLa cells. This phenotype is caused by defects in DNA replication and repair. No phenotype is observed when cells contain both wild-type and L221P forms of RPA1, indicating that L221P is not dominant. Recombinant L221P polypeptide forms a stable complex with the other subunits of RPA, indicating that the mutation does not destabilize the protein; however, the resulting complex has dramatically reduced ssDNA binding activity and cannot support SV40 DNA replication in vitro. These findings indicate that in mammals, the L221P mutation causes a defect in ssDNA binding and a nonfunctional protein complex. This suggests that haploinsufficiency of RPA causes an increase in the levels of DNA damage and in the incidence of cancer. Mol Cancer Res; 8(7); 1017-26. (C) 2010 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available