4.6 Article

Genetic dissection of grain weight in bread wheat through quantitative trait locus interval and association mapping

Journal

MOLECULAR BREEDING
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages 963-972

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11032-011-9693-4

Keywords

Bread wheat; Grain weight; QTL interval mapping; Association mapping

Funding

  1. Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Government of India
  2. DST through FIST
  3. University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi through SAP-DRS
  4. Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genetic dissection of grain weight in bread wheat was undertaken through both genome-wide quantitative trait locus (QTL) interval mapping and association mapping. QTL interval mapping involved preparation of a framework linkage map consisting of 294 loci {194 simple sequence repeats (SSRs), 86 amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs) and 14 selective amplifications of microsatellite polymorphic loci (SAMPL)} using a bi-parental recombinant inbred line (RIL) mapping population derived from Rye Selection111 x Chinese Spring. Using the genotypic data and phenotypic data on grain weight (GW) of RILs collected over six environments, genome-wide single locus QTL analysis was conducted to identify main effect QTL. This led to identification of as many as ten QTL including four major QTL (three QTL were stable), each contributing > 20% phenotypic variation (PV) for GW. The above study was supplemented with association mapping, which allowed identification of 11 new markers in the genomic regions that were not reported earlier to harbour any QTL for GW. It also allowed identification of closely linked markers for six known QTL, and validation of eight QTL reported earlier. The QTL identified through QTL interval mapping and association mapping may prove useful in marker-assisted selection(MAS) for the development of cultivars with high GW in bread wheat.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available