4.6 Article

Large-scale development of expressed sequence tag-derived simple sequence repeat markers and diversity analysis in Arachis spp.

Journal

MOLECULAR BREEDING
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 125-138

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11032-011-9604-8

Keywords

Arachis spp.; EST-SSR marker; Polymorphic analysis; Genetic diversity

Funding

  1. Kazusa DNA Research Institute Foundation
  2. JSPS (Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science) [20380008]
  3. postdoctoral fellowship for foreign researchers [08617]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20380008] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Large-scale development of expressed sequence tag simple sequence repeat (EST-SSR) markers was performed in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) to obtain more informative genetic markers. A total of 10,102 potential non-redundant EST sequences, including 3,445 contigs and 6,657 singletons, were generated from cDNA libraries of the gynophore, roots, leaves and seedlings. A total of 3,187 primer pairs were designed on flanking regions of SSRs, some of which allowed one and two base mismatches. Among the 3,187 markers generated, 2,540 (80%) were trinucleotide repeats, 302 (9%) were dinucleotide repeats, and 345 (11%) were tetranucleotide repeats. Pre-polymorphic analyses of 24 Arachis accessions were performed using 10% polyacrylamide gels. A total of 1,571 EST-SSR markers showing clear polymorphisms were selected for further polymorphic analysis with a Fluoro-fragment Analyzer. The 16 Arachis accessions examined included cultivated peanut varieties as well as diploid species with the A or B genome. Altogether 1,281 (81.5%) of the 1,571 markers were polymorphic among the 16 accessions, and 366 (23.3%) were polymorphic among the 12 cultivated varieties. Diversity analysis was performed and the genotypes of all 16 Arachis accessions showed similarity coefficients ranging from 0.37 to 0.97.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available