4.1 Article

A meta-analysis of caloric restriction gene expression profiles to infer common signatures and regulatory mechanisms

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOSYSTEMS
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages 1339-1349

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2mb05255e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Erasmus programme
  2. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung
  3. BBSRC [BB/H008497/1]
  4. Ellison Medical Foundation
  5. Marie Curie International Reintegration [EC-FP7]
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/H008497/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Caloric restriction, a reduction in calorie intake without malnutrition, retards age-related degeneration and extends lifespan in several organisms. CR induces multiple changes, yet its underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. In this work, we first performed a meta-analysis of microarray CR studies in mammals and identified genes and processes robustly altered due to CR. Our results reveal a complex array of CR-induced changes and we re-identified several genes and processes previously associated with CR, such as growth hormone signalling, lipid metabolism and immune response. Moreover, our results highlight novel associations with CR, such as retinol metabolism and copper ion detoxification, as well as hint of a strong effect of CR on circadian rhythms that in turn may contribute to metabolic changes. Analyses of our signatures by integrating co-expression data, information on genetic mutants, and transcription factor binding site analysis revealed candidate regulators of transcriptional modules in CR. Our results hint at a transcriptional module involved in sterol metabolism regulated by Srebf1. A putative regulatory role of Ppara was also identified. Overall, our conserved molecular signatures of CR provide a comprehensive picture of CR-induced changes and help understand its regulatory mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available