4.1 Article

A quantitative study of the recruitment potential of all intracellular tyrosine residues on EGFR, FGFR1 and IGF1R

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOSYSTEMS
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages 643-653

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b801018h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R33CA128726] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [T32GM007598] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NCI NIH HHS [R33 CA128726, 1 R33 CA128726-01, R33 CA128726-02] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIGMS NIH HHS [T32 GM007598, 5 T32 GM07598-25] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Receptor tyrosine kinases transmit and process extracellular cues by recruiting intracellular signaling proteins to sites of tyrosine phosphorylation. Using protein microarrays comprising virtually every human SH2 and PTB domain, we generated quantitative protein interaction maps for three well-studied receptors - EGFR, FGFR1 and IGF1R - using phosphopeptides derived from every intracellular tyrosine residue on each receptor, regardless of whether or not they are phosphorylated in vivo. We found that, in general, peptides derived from physiological sites of tyrosine phosphorylation bind to substantially more SH2 or PTB domains than do peptides derived from nonphysiological sites, supporting the idea that kinases and interaction domains co-evolve and suggesting that new sites arise predominantly through selection favoring advantageous interactions, rather than through selection disfavoring unwanted interactions. We also found substantial qualitative overlap in the recruitment profiles of these three receptors, suggesting that their different biological effects arise, at least in part, from quantitative differences in their affinities for the proteins they recruit.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available