4.5 Article

Effects of DGAT1 gene on meat and carcass fatness quality in Chinese commercial cattle

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTS
Volume 40, Issue 2, Pages 1947-1954

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11033-012-2251-2

Keywords

Cattle; DGAT1 gene; Meat and carcass fatness quality traits; SNPs

Funding

  1. earmarked fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System [CARS-38]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30871774, 31272428, 31201768]
  3. New Variety of Transgenic Organism Great Breeding Program [2008ZX08007-002, 2009ZX08007-005B, 2009ZX08009-157B]
  4. Twelfth Five-Year Plan National Science and Technology Support Project [2011BAD28B04]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2012M510011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study was designed to investigate the candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the exon's region of bovine diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase (DGAT1) gene using bioinformatics and experimental methods. A total of 17 SNPs were screened from public data resources and DNA sequencing. Three SNPs (c.572A > G, c.1241C > T and c.1416T > G) of these candidate SNPs were genotyped by created restriction site-polymerase chain reaction (CRS-PCR) methods. The gene-specific SNP markers and their effects on meat and carcass fatness quality traits were evaluated in Chinese commercial cattle. The c.572A > G and c.1416T > G significantly effected on backfat thickness, longissimus muscle area, marbling score, fat color and Warner-Bratzler shear force. No significant association was detected between the c.1241C > T and measured traits. Results from this study suggested that the SNP markers may be effective for the marker-assisted selection of meat and carcass fatness quality traits, and added new evidence that DGAT1 gene is an important candidate gene for the improvement of meat and carcass fatness quality in beef cattle industry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available