4.3 Article

An initial investigation into the ecology of culturable aerobic postmortem bacteria

Journal

SCIENCE & JUSTICE
Volume 55, Issue 6, Pages 394-401

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2015.07.003

Keywords

Taphonomy; Larval mass; pH; Redox potential; Temperature; Total body score

Funding

  1. Clarkson Aerospace Minority Leaders Program [2015-0073]
  2. NIH-BRIC [P789097-876]
  3. Air Force Research Laboratory

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Postmortem microorganisms are increasingly recognized for their potential to serve as physical evidence. Yet, we still understand little about the ecology of postmortem microbes, particularly those associated with the skin and larval masses. We conducted an experiment to characterize microbiological and chemical properties of decomposing swine (Sus scrofa domesticus) carcasses on the island of Oahu, Hawaii, USA, during June 2013. Bacteria were collected from the head, limb, and larval mass during the initial 145 h of decomposition. We also measured the pH, temperature, and oxidation-reduction potential of larval masses in situ. Bacteria were cultured aerobically on Standard Nutrient Agar at 22 degrees C and identified using protein or genetic signals. Carcass decomposition followed a typical sigmoidal pattern and associated bacterial communities differed by sampling location and time since death, although all communities were dominated by phyla Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria. Larval masses were reducing environments (similar to-200 mV) of neutral pH (6.5-75) and high temperature (35 degrees C-40 degrees C). We recommend that culturable postmortem and larval mass microbiology and chemistry be investigated in more detail, as it has potential to complement culture-independent studies and serve as a rapid estimate of PMI. (C) 2015 The Chartered Society of Forensic Sciences. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available