4.5 Article

Polymorphisms of coding region of BMPR-IB gene and their relationship with litter size in sheep

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTS
Volume 38, Issue 6, Pages 4071-4076

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11033-010-0526-z

Keywords

Bone morphogenetic protein receptor IB gene; PCR-SSCP; Prolificacy; Sheep

Funding

  1. National Key Technology R and D Program of China [2008BADB2B01, 2006BAD01A11, 2006BAD13B08]
  2. earmarked fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System of China [nycytx-39]
  3. National Key Basic Research and Development Program of China [2006CB102105]
  4. Beijing Science and Technology Program of China [Y0705003041131, BJNY2006-03]
  5. Beijing Natural Science Foundation of China [5042017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The bone morphogenetic protein receptor IB (BMPR-IB) was studied as a candidate gene for the prolificacy of sheep. Nine pairs of primers (P1-P9) were designed to detect single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of exons 1-4 and 6-10 of the BMPR-IB gene in both high (Small Tail Han and Hu sheep) and low prolificacy breeds (Texel and Chinese Merino sheep) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP). Only the products amplified by primers P2, P5, P6, P7, P8 and P9 displayed polymorphisms. The present study identified 22 SNPs in partial coding regions of ovine BMPR-IB, in which 20 SNPs were reported for the first time. In total of the 22 mutations, 18 DNA variations were originated from the Hu breed, three were found in the Small Tail Han breed (two of them were found in other sheep breeds), three in the Chinese Merino breed, and none in the Texel breed. These results preliminarily demonstrated that BMPR-IB is a major gene affecting the hyperprolificacy in Small Tail Han and Hu sheep, and could be used as a molecular genetic marker for early auxiliary selection for hyperprolificacy in sheep.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available