4.4 Article

Direct membrane binding and self-interaction contribute to Mmr1 function in mitochondrial inheritance

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL
Volume 29, Issue 19, Pages 2346-2357

Publisher

AMER SOC CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E18-02-0122

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) Training Grant [T32GM008382]
  2. NIH NIGMS [R01GM120303]
  3. Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center-The Lefkofsky Family Foundation/Liz and Eric Lefkofsky Innovation Research Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mitochondrial transport and anchoring mechanisms work in concert to position mitochondria to meet cellular needs. In yeast, Mmr1 functions as a mitochondrial adaptor for Myo2 to facilitate actin-based transport of mitochondria to the bud. Posttransport, Mmr1 is proposed to anchor mitochondria at the bud tip. Although both functions require an interaction between Mmr1 and mitochondria, the molecular basis of the Mmr1-mitochondria interaction is poorly understood. Our in vitro phospholipid binding assays indicate Mmr1 can directly interact with phospholipid membranes. Through structure-function studies we identified an unpredicted membrane-binding domain composed of amino acids 76-195 that is both necessary and sufficient for Mmr1 to interact with mitochondria in vivo and liposomes in vitro. In addition, our structure-function analyses indicate that the coiled-coil domain of Mmr1 is necessary and sufficient for Mmr1 self-interaction and facilitates the polarized localization of the protein. Disrupting either the Mmr1-membrane interaction or Mmr1 self-interaction leads to defects in mitochondrial inheritance. Therefore, direct membrane binding and self-interaction are necessary for Mmr1 function in mitochondrial inheritance and are utilized as a means to spatially and temporally regulate mitochondrial positioning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available