4.4 Article

E-cadherin phosphorylation occurs during its biosynthesis to promote its cell surface stability and adhesion

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL
Volume 25, Issue 16, Pages 2365-2374

Publisher

AMER SOC CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E14-01-0690

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Cancer Center Support Grant (National Cancer Institute) [CA060553]
  2. National Cancer Institute CCSG [P30 CA060553]
  3. Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
  4. National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [T32HL076139]
  5. National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute [F30 CA171944-01A1]
  6. National Institutes of Health [GM076561, HL094643]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

E-cadherin is highly phosphorylated within its beta-catenin-binding region, and this phosphorylation increases its affinity for beta-catenin in vitro. However, the identification of key serines responsible for most cadherin phosphorylation and the adhesive consequences of modification at such serines have remained unknown. In this study, we show that as few as three serines in the beta-catenin-binding domain of E-cadherin are responsible for most radioactive phosphate incorporation. These serines are required for binding to beta-catenin and the mutual stability of both E-cadherin and beta-catenin. Cells expressing a phosphodeficient (3S>A) E-cadherin exhibit minimal cell-cell adhesion due to enhanced endocytosis and degradation through a lysosomal compartment. Conversely, negative charge substitution at these serines (3S>D) antagonizes cadherin endocytosis and restores wild-type levels of adhesion. The cadherin kinase is membrane proximal and modifies the cadherin before it reaches the cell surface. Together these data suggest that E-cadherin phosphorylation is largely constitutive and integral to cadherin-catenin complex formation, surface stability, and function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available