4.4 Article

DNA damage checkpoint and recombinational repair differentially affect the replication stress tolerance of smc6 mutants

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL
Volume 24, Issue 15, Pages 2431-2441

Publisher

AMER SOC CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E12-11-0836

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of General Medical Science [R01 GM080670]
  2. American Cancer Society [RSG-12-013-01-CCG]
  3. Lymphoma Society
  4. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro [IG 10637]
  5. European Research Council [242928]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

DNA damage checkpoint and recombinational repair are both important for cell survival of replication stress. Because these two processes influence each other, isolation of their respective contributions is challenging. Research in budding yeast shows that removal of the DNA helicase Mph1 improves survival of cells with defective Smc5/6 complex under replication stress. mph1 Delta is known to reduce the levels of recombination intermediates in smc6 mutants. Here, we show that mph1 Delta also hyperactivates the Mec1 checkpoint. We dissect the effects of recombination regulation and checkpoint hyperactivation by altering the checkpoint circuitry to enhance checkpoint signaling without reducing recombination intermediate levels. We show that these approaches, similar to mph1 Delta, lead to better survival of smc6 cells upon transient replication stress, likely by ameliorating replication and chromosomal segregation defects. Unlike mph1 Delta, however, they do not suppress smc6 sensitivity to chronic stress. Conversely, reducing the checkpoint response does not impair survival of smc6 mph1 Delta mutants under chronic stress. These results suggest a two-phase model in which smc6 mutant survival upon transient replication stress can be improved by enhancing Mec1 checkpoint signaling, whereas smc6 sensitivity to chronic stress can be overcome by reducing recombination intermediates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available