4.4 Article

TOR and RAS pathways regulate desiccation tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 115-128

Publisher

AMER SOC CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E12-07-0524

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Research Service Award [(GM097852]
  3. NIH R01 [GM046406]
  4. National Institute of General Medical Sciences Center for Quantitative Biology [GM071508]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tolerance to desiccation in cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is inducible; only one in a million cells from an exponential culture survive desiccation compared with one in five cells in stationary phase. Here we exploit the desiccation sensitivity of exponentially dividing cells to understand the stresses imposed by desiccation and their stress response pathways. We found that induction of desiccation tolerance is cell autonomous and that there is an inverse correlation between desiccation tolerance and growth rate in glucose-, ammonia-, or phosphate-limited continuous cultures. A transient heat shock induces a 5000-fold increase in desiccation tolerance, whereas hyper-ionic, -reductive, -oxidative, or -osmotic stress induced much less. Furthermore, we provide evidence that the Sch9p-regulated branch of the TOR and Ras-cAMP pathway inhibits desiccation tolerance by inhibiting the stress response transcription factors Gis1p, Msn2p, and Msn4p and by activating Sfp1p, a ribosome biogenesis transcription factor. Among 41 mutants defective in ribosome biogenesis, a subset defective in 60S showed a dramatic increase in desiccation tolerance independent of growth rate. We suggest that reduction of a specific intermediate in 60S biogenesis, resulting from conditions such as heat shock and nutrient deprivation, increases desiccation tolerance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available