4.4 Article

Regulation of flagellar motility by the conserved flagellar protein CG34110/Ccdc135/FAP50

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL
Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages 976-987

Publisher

AMER SOC CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E10-04-0331

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [DK071073, GM030626]
  2. PKD Research Foundation
  3. Robert W. Booth Endowment
  4. W.M. Keck Foundation
  5. NIH Center [P30ES06639, P30CA22453, U54RR020843]
  6. Burnham Institute
  7. Perinatology Research Branch of the NICHD, Wayne State University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Eukaryotic cilia and flagella are vital sensory and motile organelles. The calcium channel PKD2 mediates sensory perception on cilia and flagella, and defects in this can contribute to ciliopathic diseases. Signaling from Pkd2-dependent Ca2+ rise in the cilium to downstream effectors may require intermediary proteins that are largely unknown. To identify these proteins, we carried out genetic screens for mutations affecting Drosophila melanogaster sperm storage, a process mediated by Drosophila Pkd2. Here we show that a new mutation lost boys (lobo) encodes a conserved flagellar protein CG34110, which corresponds to vertebrate Ccdc135 (E = 6e-78) highly expressed in ciliated respiratory epithelia and sperm, and to FAP50 (E = 1e-28) in the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii flagellar proteome. CG34110 localizes along the fly sperm flagellum. FAP50 is tightly associated with the outer doublet microtubules of the axoneme and appears not to be a component of the central pair, radial spokes, dynein arms, or structures defined by the mbo waveform mutants. Phenotypic analyses indicate that both Pkd2 and lobo specifically affect sperm movement into the female storage receptacle. We hypothesize that the CG34110/Ccdc135/FAP50 family of conserved flagellar proteins functions within the axoneme to mediate Pkd2-dependent processes in the sperm flagellum and other motile cilia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available