4.4 Article

The Smc5/6 Complex and Esc2 Influence Multiple Replication-associated Recombination Processes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages 2306-2314

Publisher

AMER SOC CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e10-01-0050

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
  2. European Research Council [242928]
  3. National Institutes of Health [R01-GM080670]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [242928] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Replication-associated recombinational repair is important for genome duplication and cell survival under DNA damage conditions. Several nonclassical recombination factors have been implicated in this process, but their functional relationships are not clear. Here, we show that three of these factors, Mph1, Mms2, and the Shu complex, can act independently to promote the formation of recombination intermediates during impaired replication. However, their functions become detrimental when cells lack the Smc5/6 complex or Esc2. We show that mph1 Delta, mms2 Delta, and shu1 Delta suppress the sensitivity to the replication-blocking agent methylmethane sulfonate (MMS) in smc6 mutants, with double deletions conferring stronger suppression. These deletion mutations also rescue the MMS sensitivity of esc2 Delta cells. In addition, two-dimensional gel analysis demonstrates that mph1 Delta, mms2 Delta, and shu1 Delta each reduce the level of recombination intermediates in an smc6 mutant when cells replicate in the presence of MMS, and that double deletions lead to a greater reduction. Our work thus suggests that Mph1, Mms2, and the Shu complex can function in distinct pathways in replication-associated recombinational repair and that the Smc5/6 complex and Esc2 prevent the accumulation of toxic recombination intermediates generated in these processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available